Friday, February 08, 2008
Archbishop of Canterbury
The Anchoress is the steward of one mighty blog. While many of us would like to forget 9-11 the Islamification of Britain (and Europe) continues its unrelenting advance. While the left dismisses our reportage as sabre rattling (or a planned effort to perpetuate fear to arrest personal freedom) the advance continues and is abetted by a complicit (nay, clueless left).
Whether it's protesting images of Mohammed in Wikipedia or the Archbishop of Canterbury's remarks about Sharia law in Britain being "unavoidable" the advancement, purposes and plans of radical Islam are real.
The best book of 2006 is America Alone by Mark Steyn and coupled with the rise of democratic/liberal fascism as presented by Jonah Goldberg (and further advanced by middle/third way Mead in God and Gold) the emerging reality for Western Civilization is grim.
The country should take notice when the Denmark equivalent of the New York Times contemplates whether or not George W. Bush was a great president.
Related
The Captain weighs in:
Whether it's protesting images of Mohammed in Wikipedia or the Archbishop of Canterbury's remarks about Sharia law in Britain being "unavoidable" the advancement, purposes and plans of radical Islam are real.
The best book of 2006 is America Alone by Mark Steyn and coupled with the rise of democratic/liberal fascism as presented by Jonah Goldberg (and further advanced by middle/third way Mead in God and Gold) the emerging reality for Western Civilization is grim.
The country should take notice when the Denmark equivalent of the New York Times contemplates whether or not George W. Bush was a great president.
Related
The Captain weighs in:
The Archbishop forgot that Britain operates under a representative government, not a theocracy. The adoption of shari'a would obliterate that system and place the UK under the thumb of imams -- a prospect that even British Muslims find distasteful. Khalid Mahmood, a Muslim MP for Labour, noted that Muslims around the world fight to free themselves from such systems, and wondered aloud whether Williams knows what shari'a actually entails.
It's not the first time a member of the clergy has suggested appeasement and surrender for a strategy against expansion of radical Islam. The endorsement of these strategies by the leader of the Anglican Church is especially disheartening, however. That the leader of a worldwide sect of Christianity thinks of shari'a as "inevitable" should prompt questions about his fitness for that office.
Labels: democrats, end times, islamofascism, the good guys



















